A tale of two golf clubs! Unwinding a merger and corporate oppression: Falkingham v Peninsula

[With apologies for the poor audio!]

It's a difficult time to be in the gold club business, especially if you find yourself defending a s232 Corporations Act oppression suit.

Today we consider what happens when a contemplated merger between two clubs is challenged on the basis that it is oppressive.

A leading issue is whether the trial judge's discretion not to order relief ought to be overturned on House v The King grounds.

Good fun!

Please join Australian lawyer James d'Apice to find out what the Court had to say.

If you'd like to contact James his socials are:
www.linkedin.com/in/jamesdapice
twitter.com/CoffeeandaCase1
instagram.com/coffeeandacasenote
facebook.com/CoffeeandaCaseNote

And please look out for James' podcast, Coffee and a Case Note, wherever you get your podcasts!

Coffee and a Case Note,CACN,Law,Legal,Business,Corporate,Commercial,Litigation,